How do I define leadership?
Leadership is the ability to adapt the setting so everyone feels empowered to contribute creatively to solving the problems.
Leadership is an ability, meaning a leader has a capacity to do something through talent and skill. Talent is natural ability and skill is proficiency gained through training and experience. Talent certainly helps, but it isn’t required. I know many people whose natural leadership ability was close to zero but through training, experience, and most of all, persistence, became great leaders.
Leadership is adaptive, meaning that the leader makes adjustments. A leader who fails to adjust to the territory will lose their way. And only a fool willingly continues to follow someone who is lost.
Leadership acts on a setting, meaning leader adjusts the state of the surroundings and people. A leader carefully observes those states and discerns significance looking for how to adapt the setting most effectively.
Leadership empowers, meaning the leader inspires confidence and self-esteem. And that inspiration comes in many flavors. Some leaders inspire by bold talk; others by soft talk; and others by their example. There are many ways to empower rather than a single way.
Leadership acts on people’s feelings, meaning the leader finds ways to link to people’s instinct or intuition. Leaders help everyone feel empowered, which in many organizations with bad histories is a leap of faith. If the leader can also provide concrete evidence that helps the empowerment, wonderful. But evidence usually comes after the leadership actions produce the desired results.
Leadership creates contribution, which means every member gives something. Sometimes that may be sharing an idea. And sometimes that may be holding an ideas in reserve and allowing someone else to arrive at the same idea and share it.
Leadership is about solving the problems, which means closing the gap between things as desired and things as perceived. Everyone works on the solution to intermediary problems while keeping in mind the ultimate problem — closing a gap for the client or customer.
Leadership fosters creativity, meaning imaginative use of limited resources. A leader that enables people to use their imagination is a step closer to solving problems faster, better and cheaper.
Leadership is often attributes to a single individual. It’s easier to communicate success stories that way. People like simple stories that contain cause and effect even when they are wrong.
The more complex story reinforces that everyone on a team can be a leader. The most successful teams create chain reactions of leadership. An adaptation triggers long chains of further adaptations that ultimately solve seemingly impossible problems.
§
I owe a deep debt of gratitude to Jerry (Gerald M.) Weinberg for the ideas behind this post. He epitomizes this definition of leadership. His books, workshops, and teaching have deeply influenced me. My definition for leadership is an adaptation of the one he uses in his book On Becoming a Technical Leader, which I highly recommend reading. You will find Jerry’s writing a source of empowerment.
{ 1 trackback }
{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }
Reading each of these, one word comes to mind that covers each part. “Influence.” Of course that is influence in a positive sense.
Dr. Bubba, Thank you for the feedback. I agree. Influence is a compelling force for starting the leadership chain reactions that produce the desired results. It may in fact be “the” compelling force in leadership.
Your post is appealing because it exposes many ideas worth thinking about in a few words. Have you considered haiku?
Hi Jack, Thank you for the compliment. It made my morning brighter.